01Two workforces, one process
A site manager, a quantity surveyor and a marketing executive in the same company have very different working days. Many firms respond with two appraisal processes, or with one that quietly only reaches the office. The better pattern is one cycle with forms and competencies that differ by role. Everyone has an appraisal, the same reminders and the same completion tracking, but a site engineer’s form asks about temporary works and a bid manager’s asks about tenders.
02Competence is tracked per trade
Construction already records competence: CSCS cards, trade qualifications, SMSTS and SSSTS for supervisors, plant tickets and first-aid certificates. Those live in a training matrix or the HR system. A performance conversation should not duplicate them. It should refer to them: which ticket is due, which qualification opens the next role, who is ready to run their own site. The competency framework by trade gives the review something concrete to discuss.
03Projects move, managers change
Someone may work under three project managers in a year and be appraised by a fourth, the regional or operations manager. The project manager who saw the work daily is the person with the evidence. Firms that manage this well collect a short project-end note from each project manager, so the annual appraisal is built from the year rather than from the last few weeks.
04Access decides whether the cycle finishes
Site teams do not sit at a desk, may not have a company laptop and often have no company email address. A paper appraisal sent to site returns late or not at all. When an appraisal runs in a system, the questions are practical: can a site manager complete it on a phone, and can site staff be given access from the company directory without a ticket to IT for each person. Those two answers decide the completion rate.