MULTI-MANAGER REVIEWS

Multi-manager reviews. Every perspective counts.

Reflect matrix reporting, project leadership and dotted-line relationships in the way you review performance.

Book a demo
Regional directorOrganisational context
Project leadDelivery & collaboration
Employee
Functional managerCraft & development
One considered review
Working relationships, beyond the reporting line.

Performance has more than one perspective.

A line manager may see only one part of an employee’s contribution. In a matrix organisation, project and functional leaders bring different, equally relevant context.

A fuller picture for the conversation.

Bring goals, feedback and recognition into view while shaping a review that leaves room for human judgement.

Try the interactive preview
A review draft alongside goals, feedback and recognition evidence, shown in the New Dynamics desktop interface.
A review draft alongside goals, feedback and recognition evidence, shown in the New Dynamics mobile layout.
Explore reviews

A process people can put to work.

01

Map the working relationships

Include project and functional managers. Start with shared expectations and relevant context.

02

Define each reviewer’s contribution

Define reviewer roles and contribution weighting. Define the people and information that belong in the conversation.

03

Build a balanced assessment

Respect relationship-specific permissions. Agree a clear next action and a time to follow up.

In practice

A functional manager assesses craft and development; a project lead describes delivery; a regional director adds business context.

AI with the right context.

Bring authorised perspectives together in a review briefing while preserving the source of each contribution. Differences need discussion, not automatic averaging.

How AI supports the process
GoalsFeedbackRecognitionPrevious reviewsConversations

Relevant performance context

Connected. Permission-aware. Human-led.

Manager briefingA better next conversation

Make it your process.

Define the right forms, participants and follow-up. Use shared principles, with room for each team’s working rhythm.

Explore custom workflows
A process that fitsExample review workflow
1Employee reflection
2Project & peer input
3Manager reviewAI-assisted preparation
4Calibration & approval
5Development conversation
Your stages. Your participants. Your rules.

Your questions, answered.

How does multi-manager reviews fit into continuous performance?

Reflect matrix reporting, project leadership and dotted-line relationships in the way you review performance. Relevant context can then inform regular manager conversations and the next review.

Can we adapt the process to different teams?

The platform is designed around configurable stages, forms and participants. Bring a representative process to the demo so the fit and any implementation requirements can be confirmed.

Can we involve more than one manager?

Multi-manager reviews are part of the core platform design. Define project, functional and line-manager responsibilities, and confirm reviewer access and weighting requirements during evaluation.

Where should we start?

Choose one team and a process you want to improve. Use the linked guide or template to describe the desired conversation, then explore the platform with that scenario.

Bring out the best
in your people.

See what performance management could look like for your organisation.

Book a demo