01Progression is the review
Most firms publish a grade or level structure: analyst to consultant to manager, trainee to associate to partner. Each grade carries expectations for client work, technical skill, business development and leadership of others. The annual appraisal is mainly a conversation about where someone sits against the next grade and what evidence would support a promotion case. Where the framework is vague, promotion decisions drift towards who is visible to which partner.
02Chargeable hours are context, not the verdict
Utilisation and billing targets exist in almost every firm, and they are easy to pull from the practice management system. They say little about the quality of the work, the client relationship or how someone treated the juniors on the job. Firms that rely on hours alone reward the people staffed on the biggest matters. Better reviews put the numbers alongside project feedback from the partners and managers who saw the work.
03Feedback comes from many engagements
An associate may work for six different partners in a year. The line manager or counselling partner who owns the appraisal saw only part of it. Firms therefore gather feedback at the end of each engagement or matter, while the detail is fresh. The appraisal then draws those together, and the person is not judged on the one project their appraiser happened to lead.
04A small team runs the cycle for busy partners
In a firm of 15 to 200 people, HR is often one or two people, sometimes the office manager or a partner with the HR hat. The cycle lives in Word forms and a spreadsheet, and the work is chasing: partners who have not returned forms, reviews stuck at the second signature, and the year-end deadline arriving during a client deadline. Completion, not design, is where most firms’ processes fail.