Flexibility in the process
Shape forms, stages, participants and approvals around your organisation. Keep common principles while allowing different teams to work at a rhythm that makes sense.
Explore configurable workflows
vs
New Dynamics vs Small Improvements
Explore the fit for your people, your working relationships and your performance process.
THE DECISION IN BRIEF
Where should you focus the comparison?
If your priority is building healthy feedback habits, Small Improvements is a relevant shortlist choice. New Dynamics brings an additional evaluation lens around how those habits connect to multi-manager reviews and changing organisational processes. Test the process your teams need now and the variations you expect as they grow.
New Dynamics and Small Improvements, side by side
| Your decision | New DynamicsYour process, connected | Small Improvements |
|---|---|---|
| Core emphasis | Connected performance, shaped around how your organisation works. | Feedback habits for growing teams |
| Review flexibility | Configure forms, stages, participants, reminders and approvals. | Configurable performance reviews and 360 feedback with automated notifications. |
| Connected context | Bring goals, feedback and recognition into reviews and development conversations. | Objectives, 1:1 meetings, praise and ongoing feedback in one performance toolkit. |
| Test in your demo | Include line and project managers with distinct roles, contribution weighting and relationship-specific permissions. | How are shared objectives and project contributions brought into reviews? |
| Explore the fit | See your process in action → | Read the full comparison → |
WHY NEW DYNAMICSA connected approach.
A connected approach.
Room to do it your way.
Your performance process should reflect how people contribute, who sees their work and what helps them grow. New Dynamics brings those connections into the same conversation.
GoalsFeedbackRecognitionReviewsDevelopment
See New Dynamics in actionA fuller picture of contribution
Bring line managers, project leads and functional perspectives into the assessment. Define their roles, contribution weighting and permissions so responsibility stays clear.
Explore multi-manager reviewsContext that carries forward
Connect goals, feedback and recognition to the review, then turn the conversation into development. The next check-in should build on what you agreed.
Explore connected performanceA demo scenario for your Small Improvements comparison
A growing company adds its first cross-functional product teams. Keep the familiar line-manager check-in, but add input from a project lead and make a shared objective visible in the review. Ask an HR administrator to adjust the language and reviewer responsibilities. Check whether employees can still understand the process without a lengthy training session.
Give both suppliers the same anonymised example and ask to see the employee, manager and HR administrator views. Record what happens inside the product, which steps require manual coordination and what needs additional configuration. Involve the people who will use the process, not only the team choosing the software.
Questions to ask before deciding
- How are shared objectives and project contributions brought into reviews?
- Which permissions apply to private notes versus shared feedback?
- What administration is needed when teams adopt different review rhythms?
A clear answer should identify the product, plan and configuration being demonstrated. Ask to see the result rather than accept a yes-or-no feature response. Capture any dependencies in the proposal, including the people who will maintain the configuration once the initial implementation is complete.
Plan implementation around adoption
List the habits employees already use and keep their purpose clear during transition. Review private-note access separately from public praise. Trial the new workflow with a small cross-functional team before changing the company-wide review calendar.
Define a small number of useful success measures before the pilot: whether managers can find relevant evidence, whether employees understand their next development action and whether HR can handle a normal exception without a separate spreadsheet. Review the experience together and refine the process before extending it.
Compare the whole commitment
Subscription price is only part of the decision. Ask about configuration, migration, identity and HR connections, training, support and the effort required to keep the process current. Confirm data export, retention and access responsibilities with your IT and People teams. An existing HR system may continue to hold employee records even if you choose a dedicated performance platform.
For New Dynamics, bring those requirements into the discovery conversation. We can explore the stages, relationships and evidence your process needs and agree the scope for your organisation. Integration availability, migration work and commercial terms should be confirmed in writing.
Our editorial approach
Our competitor summary uses vendor-published product information. Reviewed on 18 September 2026. Evaluation scenarios and recommendations are New Dynamics’ analysis; this is a comparison published by a supplier, not an independent product test.
Capabilities can change and depend on your plan, region and configuration. Names and logos identify their respective owners and do not imply endorsement or affiliation. Read our comparison methodology or send corrections to contact@new-dynamics.com.
Your questions, answered.
Is New Dynamics an alternative to Small Improvements?
New Dynamics is an option to evaluate when your priority is connected performance management with configurable workflows and multi-manager perspectives. Small Improvements is also worth assessing against the same requirements. Compare the named product, package and employee journey rather than assuming the two proposals cover identical scope.
How should we compare New Dynamics and Small Improvements pricing?
Request proposals covering the same workforce, capabilities and services. Include implementation, historical data, integrations, training, ongoing support and renewal terms. There is no price or savings claim on this page: an accurate comparison requires the scope and commercial terms offered to your organisation.
Can we move from Small Improvements to New Dynamics?
Start with discovery and a representative pilot. List the habits employees already use and keep their purpose clear during transition. Review private-note access separately from public praise. Trial the new workflow with a small cross-functional team before changing the company-wide review calendar. Migration feasibility, supported data, technical connections and delivery dates must be agreed with the team; this page does not promise an automatic migration.
Where do the competitor facts come from?
Published Small Improvements product information was reviewed on 18 September 2026. Product summaries describe published capabilities; the demo scenario and evaluation advice are New Dynamics’ analysis. Functionality can vary by plan, region and configuration.
Keep building your shortlist.
Make performance work
the way your organisation does.
Explore a connected, flexible approach with the New Dynamics team.
Let’s compare your requirements