Flexibility in the process
Shape forms, stages, participants and approvals around your organisation. Keep common principles while allowing different teams to work at a rhythm that makes sense.
Explore configurable workflows
vs
New Dynamics vs Trakstar Perform
Explore the fit for your people, your working relationships and your performance process.
THE DECISION IN BRIEF
Where should you focus the comparison?
Compare the mechanics of your review process and the evidence available to the manager. Explore New Dynamics where the aim is to connect everyday contributions with a process that adapts to different team structures. Reporting should help explain performance decisions, as well as show whether forms were completed.
New Dynamics and Trakstar Perform, side by side
| Your decision | New DynamicsYour process, connected | Trakstar Perform |
|---|---|---|
| Core emphasis | Connected performance, shaped around how your organisation works. | Structured reviews and performance reporting |
| Review flexibility | Configure forms, stages, participants, reminders and approvals. | Performance reviews, 360 feedback, automated reminders and reporting. |
| Connected context | Bring goals, feedback and recognition into reviews and development conversations. | Goal tracking, review evidence and employee engagement surveys. |
| Test in your demo | Include line and project managers with distinct roles, contribution weighting and relationship-specific permissions. | How are review workflows adapted for project-based teams? |
| Explore the fit | See your process in action → | Read the full comparison → |
WHY NEW DYNAMICSA connected approach.
A connected approach.
Room to do it your way.
Your performance process should reflect how people contribute, who sees their work and what helps them grow. New Dynamics brings those connections into the same conversation.
GoalsFeedbackRecognitionReviewsDevelopment
See New Dynamics in actionA fuller picture of contribution
Bring line managers, project leads and functional perspectives into the assessment. Define their roles, contribution weighting and permissions so responsibility stays clear.
Explore multi-manager reviewsContext that carries forward
Connect goals, feedback and recognition to the review, then turn the conversation into development. The next check-in should build on what you agreed.
Explore connected performanceA demo scenario for your Trakstar Perform comparison
A business wants consistent review standards across several departments, but one team works almost entirely on temporary projects. Ask each supplier to retain comparable assessment criteria while changing the reviewers and timing for that team. Examine how the reporting distinguishes an incomplete form from a completed conversation and agreed action.
Give both suppliers the same anonymised example and ask to see the employee, manager and HR administrator views. Record what happens inside the product, which steps require manual coordination and what needs additional configuration. Involve the people who will use the process, not only the team choosing the software.
Questions to ask before deciding
- How are review workflows adapted for project-based teams?
- Can reporting preserve the context behind a rating?
- How are development actions tracked after the appraisal closes?
A clear answer should identify the product, plan and configuration being demonstrated. Ask to see the result rather than accept a yes-or-no feature response. Capture any dependencies in the proposal, including the people who will maintain the configuration once the initial implementation is complete.
Plan implementation around adoption
Inventory rating scales, competencies and review records. Decide how historical ratings should be interpreted if the framework changes. Reconcile employee identifiers and test one department’s complete cycle before scheduling the wider launch.
Define a small number of useful success measures before the pilot: whether managers can find relevant evidence, whether employees understand their next development action and whether HR can handle a normal exception without a separate spreadsheet. Review the experience together and refine the process before extending it.
Compare the whole commitment
Subscription price is only part of the decision. Ask about configuration, migration, identity and HR connections, training, support and the effort required to keep the process current. Confirm data export, retention and access responsibilities with your IT and People teams. An existing HR system may continue to hold employee records even if you choose a dedicated performance platform.
For New Dynamics, bring those requirements into the discovery conversation. We can explore the stages, relationships and evidence your process needs and agree the scope for your organisation. Integration availability, migration work and commercial terms should be confirmed in writing.
Our editorial approach
Our competitor summary uses vendor-published product information. Reviewed on 18 September 2026. Evaluation scenarios and recommendations are New Dynamics’ analysis; this is a comparison published by a supplier, not an independent product test.
Capabilities can change and depend on your plan, region and configuration. Names and logos identify their respective owners and do not imply endorsement or affiliation. Read our comparison methodology or send corrections to contact@new-dynamics.com.
Your questions, answered.
Is New Dynamics an alternative to Trakstar Perform?
New Dynamics is an option to evaluate when your priority is connected performance management with configurable workflows and multi-manager perspectives. Trakstar Perform is also worth assessing against the same requirements. Compare the named product, package and employee journey rather than assuming the two proposals cover identical scope.
How should we compare New Dynamics and Trakstar Perform pricing?
Request proposals covering the same workforce, capabilities and services. Include implementation, historical data, integrations, training, ongoing support and renewal terms. There is no price or savings claim on this page: an accurate comparison requires the scope and commercial terms offered to your organisation.
Can we move from Trakstar Perform to New Dynamics?
Start with discovery and a representative pilot. Inventory rating scales, competencies and review records. Decide how historical ratings should be interpreted if the framework changes. Reconcile employee identifiers and test one department’s complete cycle before scheduling the wider launch. Migration feasibility, supported data, technical connections and delivery dates must be agreed with the team; this page does not promise an automatic migration.
Where do the competitor facts come from?
Published Trakstar Perform product information was reviewed on 18 September 2026. Product summaries describe published capabilities; the demo scenario and evaluation advice are New Dynamics’ analysis. Functionality can vary by plan, region and configuration.
Keep building your shortlist.
Make performance work
the way your organisation does.
Explore a connected, flexible approach with the New Dynamics team.
Let’s compare your requirements